3
« on: March 16, 2010, 07:14:33 AM »
I as opposed can understand activists who use the cruelty free argument and that have problems with the message in vegan suffer. I think it happens for two main reasons. One is that usually when they hear that vegansim is not moral it comes out of meateaters who try to justify their consumption of animal products through the pathetic projection on vegans’ consumption. They automatically try to direct the flames back to the activists, talking about them and what is wrong with their way of life. As poor and lousy as shifting the criticism ‘right back at you’ is, it works for them, and it is very popular too, who here hasn’t heard that?
I think vegans’ position n to this article is actually a conditioned reflex to oppose to the “what about the poor carrot” argument that meateaters like so much.
The second reason is that the suffer in factory farms is so great that it is quite understandable why the ones that were exposed to it claim that everything that is not evolve with it is moral and painless even though it is not true and it is easy to figure that out just using your common sense.